Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sebastian Fanselow vs Blake Mott Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fanselow vs Mott analysis and find out who is favored!
Sebastian Fanselow vs Blake Mott Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fanselow 1 - 0 Mott
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fanselow has won 48.48% of points on their second serve, while Mott has won 42%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fanselow, in recent form, has won 50.36% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mott has won 53.86%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.05% and 33.7% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fanselow has saved 56.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mott has saved 50.89% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fanselow has won 59.52% of matches played (W/L 50/ 34), with Mott winning 67.12% (W/L 49/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fanselow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 204/ 118), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 33/ 30). Mott has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 191/ 131), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Fanselow has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.51% of matches (W/L 20/ 23), where as Mott has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.68% of matches (W/L 42/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fanselow winning 1 times and Mott being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Fanselow winning 2 and Mott winning 1. The last match between Fanselow and Mott was at the Australia F11, 16-11-2015, Second, Hard with Sebastian Fanselow getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fanselow and Mott have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fanselow winning 1 times and Mott 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fanselow winning 0, and Mott 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fanselow has played against opponents with an average rank of 221.01 while Mott has played against players with an average rank of 191.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fanselow has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mott has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fanselow has converted 36.49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mott has converted 42.13% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
324
Rank
273
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
360
Rank
220
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
60% (357-235)
Career Total W/L
57% (224-167)
50% (20-20)
YTD W/L
57% (16-12)
$3,105
Career Prize Money
$133,500
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Sebastian Fanselow vs Blake Mott For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Fanselow VS Mott
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Sebastian Fanselow | Blake Mott |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 6-0 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sebastian Fanselow | Blake Mott |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (20/20) | 57% (16/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (44/49) | 54% (36/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (443/471) | 51% (321/312) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 63% (15/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (8/5) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 154 | 67 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.41 |
| DFs Total | 124 | 126 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:12 | 1:46:41 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 226.32 | 282.54 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1610/2794) | 71% (1353/1903) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1118/1610) | 68% (917/1353) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (574/1184) | 42% (231/550) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (104/285) | 42% (83/197) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (1104/2870) | 41% (794/1953) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 46% (13/15) | 44% (4/5) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (6/3) | 67% (12/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 49% (19/39) | 57% (16/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (9/18) | 83% (5/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (9/14) | 64% (7/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (18/16) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (18/2) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (22/4) | 25% (12/3) |
Sebastian Fanselow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Raphael Collignon
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
51%
(
52 of
101)
1st Serve %
60%
(
66 of
110)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
45%
(
22 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
110)
108
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
61%
(
63 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
50%
(
44 of
88)
1st Serve %
46%
(
43 of
93)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yoshihito Nishioka
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Lucas Gerch
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
48%
(
42 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Blake Mott Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Blake Mott
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
83%
(
50 of
60)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Blake Mott
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
9
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Blake Mott
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
72%
(
78 of
109)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
5
Aces
11
9
Double Faults
4
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
46 of
68)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
44 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
107
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Ricardas Berankis
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yshai Oliel
Player
Blake Mott
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve %
87%
(
83 of
95)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
51 of
83)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Charles Broom
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Blake Mott
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Giles Hussey
87%
(
67 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Shintaro Imai
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
9 of
36)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
53 of
97)
110
Total Points Won
85
|
6-0 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Fanselow Vs Mott Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Fanselow are available here and Mott photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
